People make mistakes. Agents take unexpected paths. Give both room to work within boundaries your security team can understand and govern.
Company policy · Bounded execution · Connected evidence
Delegate the ambitious task. Explore another approach. Keep routine work moving inside clear company boundaries.
Set the boundaries, connect the evidence, and focus review on consequential exceptions. Give your team context to act.
Connect supported agent activity, optional conversation evidence, system observations, and coverage. Understand the source behind each finding.
Scope company resources and examine sensitive-content signals, available context, and destinations when information crosses between workflows.
Bind permissions to the operation. Limit temporary authority and distinguish creating an artifact from executing, sending, or publishing it.
Give candidate approaches isolated workspaces. Validate the exact result and carry forward accepted changes while separately controlling external effects.
Combine reusable policy, grouped findings, and tiered screening to reduce repetitive review and unnecessary interruptions.
Connect evidence, company policy, employee explanations, and analyst assessments in an accountable investigation workflow.
Explore the situations your teams face, what can go wrong, and how Gensee can help.
Tiered screening is designed to minimize false alerts and unnecessary approvals while preserving evidence for review.
Combine policy checks and model-assisted screening. Group related findings and assess expected activity before escalating a concern.
For employees: fewer unnecessary questions.
Connect permissions, affected resources, activity, and observed effects. Surface supporting evidence and what remains unknown.
For security: less manual reconstruction.
Present a focused brief and recommended next steps. Human review happens where company policy and the risk call for it.
For both: clearer, more accountable decisions.
Workflow illustration. High-risk signals can reach analysts while enrichment continues. An uncertain assessment stays uncertain; screened findings remain available for review. Model confidence alone is not permission to discard evidence.
Follow one finance-file change through the actual product. Every screen has a job to do.
Scroll to follow the investigation
1
2
3
01 / Activity
See what the harness reported, including its stated outcome.
A finance-file change sits alongside ordinary project work.
Source labels distinguish runtime reports from independent OS observations.
1
2
3
02 / Policy & alert
The finding names the company condition and policy revision.
Inspect the reported write to forecast.csv and its source context.
Carry the finding and its supporting evidence into an investigation.
1
2
3
03 / Investigation
The saved case links back to the original detection.
Review the resource, reported outcome, and matched condition together.
Preserve a record of changes and assessments as the investigation develops.
1
2
3
04 / Employee context
Ask about the relevant action and task, with supporting context.
Retain the response alongside the investigation evidence.
Document the decision. An explanation does not automatically change policy.
Actual product · synthetic demonstration. The console and evidence workflow are real; source reports and the employee explanation are simulated. These screens demonstrate investigation, not preventive blocking.
Silent walkthrough with on-screen captions. The annotated screens above provide a text alternative for the workflow.
Explore the engineering questions behind Gensee’s approach to agent safety.
How live workspace branches return useful results—and where their boundaries end.
Read the research ↗ LONG-HORIZON AGENT SAFETYWhat real incidents teach us about shared services, persistent state, and control over time.
Read the analysis ↗No. The design centers on reusable company policy: work inside an approved boundary can proceed automatically. Human review is reserved for actions and exceptions that require it. Policy decisions, alerts, and employee notifications are separate choices.
Related findings can share one alert while retaining their original evidence. Policy context and tiered screening help focus investigation. Reduced notification volume is distinct from a measured false-positive reduction; evaluation should track both missed issues and unnecessary interruptions.
The walkthrough shows the actual console, policy-linked findings, saved evidence, and employee-response workflow using synthetic inputs. A reported action, an observed effect, and verified preventive enforcement are different facts. Coverage depends on the source, integration, platform, and configured release.
Rollback and discard apply to supported isolated workspace state. They do not unsend an email, recall leaked data, or reverse arbitrary remote transactions. Publishing, network writes, and production changes need separately governed execution or approval.
Start with the exact workflows and platforms your team uses. The current demonstration covers the company console and managed Mac evidence workflows, including supported Claude Code and Cowork sources. Runtime isolation and enforcement depend on the execution environment. We will scope the integrations and acceptance criteria with you.
See Gensee in action, or help shape what comes next. Start with the work your people and agents actually do.
